data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b0ab/1b0abc3556d55b0fe6da506eed7f44fc150a81ef" alt=""
Detail of Hedmark fylke, Grue, Ministerialbok nr. 8 (1847-1858), Inn- og utflyttede 1853-1857, side 371. Image courtesy of Digitalarkivet.
Descendants and Ancestors of Brede Bredesen Sander (1822-1905).
When the [Theological] department was organized as a school in 1869, it was moved to a campus across from the northwest corner of the New Haven Green composed of East Divinity Hall (1869), Marquand Chapel (1871), West Divinity Hall (1871), and the Trowbridge Library (1881). The buildings, designed by Richard Morris Hunt, were demolished under the residential college plan and replaced by Calhoun College.The star on the map above representing Calhoun College is where West Divinity Hall (shown below) was located.
Dear Professor Larsen:
Your esteemed and highly welcomed letter of 29th April has arrived. It was not without surprise that I observed that I had been billed by the College. A forgotten debt it can't be. At the opening of school in January '74, I paid the steward $20, as I remember. The rest was not paid until sometime during the summer. A day or two before the last payment I asked the steward O. Larsen if he would be so kind to check and see how much I still owed so that I could pay that; and I especially brought it to his attention that the entire amount was more than two quarters. The same was repeated when a day or two later I paid him. But he answered that from New Year on it would be regarded as half a year. And so I paid him. Perhaps steward Larsen still remembers it. It is not my intention to hide behind the steward's lack of accuracy. If I come home during vacation I will pay then, if not, I will send the money anyway. In the meantime I am very indebted that it will be being corrected.
There is an insinuation in your letter dear professor, that I must have your permission to correct, since it is unwarranted, and I had earlier heard something like it from others. That my specialty is not "more direct" came from the Synod, and not necessarily from the lack of money, although I -- ceteris paribus (all other things being equal) -- would prefer a larger over a small salary. But one is not equally qualified in everything. And for such work that I am (best) qualified the Synod has deemed it, as far as I know, to be of no use. There are still many of us in such situations with much to learn; and then I believe the East has better teaching methods than the West. I am also a Norwegian American. The greatest part of my life has been in American schools, and therefore I often feel sad when I hear these negative discussions.
Friendly greetings from your student,
respectfully Anton Sander
Lawrenceville, New Jersey,
The 6th of May, 1878
56 Monro N.Y.
June 29, 1878
Dear Professor Larsen:
Your esteemed letter should have been answered a long time ago, without sending you a "Post Order" for my remaining debt to the College. I thank you because you made me aware of it; but now I am ashamed for taking such a long time to pay it. My school work stopped on Thursday because of vacation and after spending a few days with Pastor Everson I think I will be spending the summer in New Haven doing my own work. I was a little careless in my earlier letter. I did not have any special meaning in mind. From what little I can understand it has been decided that "bomman" School was a superfluous institution and not to be recommended. I sincerely hope that I had misunderstood that.
A heartfelt greeting from your respectful student.
Anton Sander
Dear Professor Larsen:
Allow me to thank you for your esteemed letter of the 3rd that contained your dear explanation. It is gratifying to me that my earlier article regarding "Synodene" [the Synod] teaching about School-Question had been misunderstood. I have not, for a long time, followed the discussions; but it had occurred to me that there are some who did not express themselves as clearly as you, dear Professor, or is there a separation and those like myself have misunderstood the "Synoden's" position.
With friendly greetings, your respectful student,
Anton Sander
202 Elm St. New Haven, Conn.
the 15th July 1878
Dear President Larsen:
Your esteemed letter of the 20th gave me cause to be not just a little surprised. It was kind of you to accept my humble thank you for the honor that you, Mr. President, and the other professors and teachers at Luther College so unexpectedly have shown me. I can't do other than accept the call with the hope that God will guide us to do our best with His blessing. I thought at first that I would not accept it, but with closer consideration after I had consulted Pastor C. S. Everson in New York, and others, I came to this decision. It is not without concern to that I accept an invitation to a position of such importance.
In regards to the arrangements of work and associations I don't believe it will be of any great difficulty. I am willing to reprimand and teach when it is in the right spirit. My thoughts are to consider others as cultured "Gentlemen" and also myself as such.
In regards to what classes I should teach I would suggest Greek and Latin. This has been my specialty for several years, and studied for the most part at Luther College -- either a private education or otherwise: so I believe -- without being guilty of any sinful self-righteousness -- that I dare to regard -- these classes as somewhat "adult." And beside it is not out of the question to teach English, German, Hebrew, or something else. (Other than mathematics). My greatest difficulty would probably be Norwegian since I have not spoken it for .... ? teaching in English. [cannot decipher]
Salary will have to be decided by the College. My moving expenses should be about $100 dollars.
My intentions are, God willing, to travel west on the 19th of August presumably traveling by train to Buffalo and then by steamship through the great lakes to Milwaukee or Duluth. I hope to hear from you closer to the time I leave.
With heartfelt greetings to you and the College's professors and teachers.
Your young student, Anton Sander
202 Elm St., New Haven, Conn.
30th July, 1878
Dear President Larsen:
[Cannot decipher completely] Your .... I have just received and I thank you for that. You did not misunderstand; this is "single" - et lege et corde.
The schedule, I am not worried about, will be completed when I get there.
If Prof. Siewers's old room is still divided into two, I would suggest [that I] not live at the College: otherwise it will not make any difference.
My salary at the school in New Jersey was to be $600 "and home" (= furnished room, board, and washing). I don't know what it costs to live in Decorah. The college will have to make the adjustments whether the $100 cost of traveling is covered or not. If at the time of my arrival I could get help to get my room furnished, I would be very thankful and if it could be done as soon as possible.
Friendly greetings from
Your student,
Anton Sander
202 Elm St. New Haven, Conn.
6th Aug. 1878
New Haven, Conn.And so began Anton's brief tenure at Luther College.
Aug. 15, 1878
Dear President Larsen:
I received your esteemed letter of the 12th today and I am very thankful for the information. The schedule and classes satisfy me completely, and I have nothing special that I have to do. I am excited about the Hebrew, and I have no great concerns about the high requirements. In regards to where I will live I leave to you and the College to decide; although I, as far as I know, would suggest that I live at the College. I thank you for your willingness to help me get my room in order. I leave for New York in the evening and leave from there on Monday morning, probably getting to Decorah before Monday or Tuesday of the following week.
I will then put it all into God's hands with a prayer and His blessings to guide my way so that my work will benefit the College.
Respectfully yours,
A. Sander
Anton B. Sander, '74, has the distinction of being the first graduate of Luther College to earn the Ph.D. degree (at Yale University in 1877). Although very popular with the students, he had the temerity, in a meeting of the Decorah congregation, to challenge certain views of the church leaders. Moreover, he was regarded by some of the faculty as "too American." Accordingly, as not "firmly orthodox," he was dropped from the faculty after one year (1878-1879). [22] His promising career was cut short two years later by illness.Since I am only in possession of a photocopy of this page from the book, I can only speculate that Nelson may have had access to an unpublished manuscript, "At Luther College," by Andrew Andersen Veblen. Since that information is fairly lengthy it will be dealt with in the next post. It is interesting to note here, however, that Veblen states that Rev. Koren "did not think Dr. S. unfit on doctrinal grounds."
[. . . ] Professor Adolph Bredesen closed his connection with the college at the end of the academic year 1877-8, and entered in the pastorate of Perry Congregation, Dane Co. Wis. Dr. Anton Sander, who came to the college in the autumn, occupied the rooms upstairs in "Sunnyside" that Mr. Bredesen had used. Dr. S. took his meals with us, and we became very good friends and I enjoyed much of his company during the year, 1878-9, of his stay at Luther. This same fall, 1878, Professor Halvard Roalkvam came to the College. The staff now consisted of 9 members: Larsen, Brandt, Bothne, Jacobsen, Narvesen, Reque, Veblen, Sander, [and] Roalkvam.
[. . . ] October 14th is at Luther College "Dedication Day." It is observed as a holiday and the chief event of the day has been the illumination of the building in the evening. In every window were placed several candles. Three strokes of the bell were the signal at which the candles were simultaneously lighted in all windows. The sight was a fine one, and it never failed to bring out a large number of people to view the spectacle. Many of these came up to the campus, and the number of young people who on these occasions mingled with the students, made the campus a place of considerable gaiety during the evening. Exercises were generally held in the chapel to end up the day, and there would be music and addresses, forming a short program, ending with a short devotional service, such as was usually observed at the close of each day of the week.
In the fall of 1878, there was a movement among the boys to celebrate the day more elaborately than had usually been the case. A mass meeting, or a committee, of the students considered the question of serving refreshments to the visitors who might come. An application was made to the President for permission to carry out this purpose. The request came before the faculty in regular meeting; but objection was raised to the feature of the proposed treat which specified the use of wine among the refreshments. The president asked each member in turn to state his mind, and I for one was surprised to find that some of those first asked were favorably disposed toward granting the request, allowing wine to be served. When my turn came to express myself I objected emphatically to this part of the preposition. Dr. Sander, who was the next to be asked said he agreed with me. We both said that we should consider it very unfortunate if such a request was allowed. President Larsen therefore remarked that in the face of such determined objection he should not wish to grant the petition. Dr. S. and I were then taken to task for being "puritans" and I can not recall what else we were that was objectionable by certain members. But the use of wine on Oct. 14th was not granted.
But the matter was not allowed to rest so simply as all that. Prof. Th. Bothne was at that time acting as secretary of the faculty. When the minutes of the meeting at which the matter was discussed and passed on, as stated, were read as the first item of business at the next faculty meeting, the secretary devoted considerable space to a report of the action. In it he told how certain members, among whom he named Prof. Reque and himself as having emphatically rebuked "professorene Sander og Veblen" for hindering the boys in their liberal project by obstructing it on the ground of puritan and illiberal objection. This was altogether contrary to the usage in the record of faculty meetings. In accordance with this, the minutes simply stated the questions voted upon and the results of the vote. No names were ever entered as to how any one voted, unless there was a specific request to have one’s position recorded, as might be in anyone's entering a protest or otherwise asking to have a record made of a personal nature, and then only by specific action or general consent. Consequently both Dr. Sander and I objected to the form of the record in this case, appealing to the faculty to have the minutes amended. Professor Bothne was directed by the President to rewrite the minutes until the next meeting. He rewrote them, and read the amended version at the next succeeding meeting. But the only change he had made was to change "professorene etc." to "De herrer professorer Sander og Veblen"; and adding one or two further epithets, evidently meant to make the intended rebuke more pointed and emphatic, and leaving his own and Reque’s names as the authors of the rebuke. As neither Dr. S. nor I, nor any other member, said anything further, it is presumed that the records, if in existence, show that Sander and Veblen hindered the use of wine on the campus or in the College on Oct. 14, 1878 and that they were taken to task for this "puritanic" attitude by professors Bothne and Reque.
[. . . ] Dr. Sander became very popular among the students, and by reason of his modest personality and his correct manners and conduct he fully deserved the loyalty and devotion that the boys gave him. But this popularity was not calculated to endear him to some of his colleagues, some of whom regarded him as being too good an American. After the episode in connection with the celebration of Oct. 14, with the accusation of puritanism, this feeling naturally was intensified. During the winter 1878-9 there was a temperance revival in Decorah, conducted by the church people in town. The meetings were very successful and began to attract many of the Norwegians. The participation of the members of the Norwegian church, was of course not relished by the pastors and other leaders of the church; and temperance meetings were started in the church which were conducted by the pastor, to be in accord with orthodox evangelical doctrine and practice. It was by some speakers explained that the “reformed” temperance meetings then in progress in town were proceeding along lines that Lutherans could not approve, and in which they should not participate. One specific objection mentioned was regarding the pledge of abstinence which was circulated for signatures in the general meetings in town. One prominent member characterized this pledge and the whole total abstinence movement as un-Lutheran because they would be "unequally yoked with unbelievers." (2 Cor. 6, 14) -- "drage et fremmed aag med Vantroe." -- Dr. Sander did not agree with this view, and made his position clear in a short speech. Ordinarily his remarks would have provoked some discussion in defense of the stand taken by the church leaders, and would most likely have caused no stir. But his remarks suited the meeting so well that a large number -- it seemed to be the greater number -- forgot themselves and broke out in a vigorous hand-clapping. This was of course an awful desecration of the sacred place in which the meeting was held, and the pastor immediately dismissed the meeting with a very curt rebuke; The occurrence was afterward by some spoken of, with bated breath, as a "scandal," though there were some who thought Dr. Sander was right, and that he at any rate could not be blamed for the impropriety on the part of the applauders. But the incident led to Dr. Sander’s being dropped from the teaching staff at the end of the year. At a special meeting of the faculty, which Dr. S was not called to attend, the president reported on interviews that he and the pastor had had with him; and the result of these were that they did not think he was as firmly orthodox as a teacher of the young men at the college should be, and that the president had better let him know that his services would not be required the following year, provided the faculty agreed. Prof. Bothne said that, so far as he was concerned, he thought we should be excused from discussing Dr. Sander's fitness if there was any question as to his orthodoxy. No one spoke further that I can recall; and I heard later from Dr. S. that he had been told that it would be best for him to begin to look for a position elsewhere. It must be remarked, that Dr. S. had been employed "temporarily," that is only for the year; but if he had been found doctrinally safe (or harmless) he would most likely have been reemployed; for the synod was in need of men and his going away could be looked on only as a serious loss.
I am not sure that the Rev. Mr. Koren was present when Dr. Sander’s case was reported on; but if not then, at another time when Dr. Sander’s case was the subject of remark by the president and possibly others, Mr. K. said he thought Sander was a "søgende sjæl," [searching soul] who was absolutely honest and eventually be found correct in his belief. I received the impression very distinctly, that while Koren did not think Dr. S. unfit on doctrinal grounds, he probably thought his retention on the faculty would have continued to be accompanied by friction due to the character of some of his colleagues. There was no mistaking the disappointment of the students when in the autumn they learned that Sander was not to return; and some were emphatic in their expressions of regret. The same manner of disappointment was voiced by the citizens. But I must record that on occasions when the matter was spoken of to Professor Larsen, in my hearing, while he refrained from finding explicit fault with Dr. S. there was always a distinct and unmistakable note of disparagement in what he had to say.
23 July 2011Images of the note mentioned and quoted in the letter are below:
Dr. Kathleen Stokker
Luther College
701 College Drive
Decorah, IA 52101
Dear Dr. Stokker:
First of all, I wish to thank you so much for your presentations at our Norse Club celebrations of syttende mai. They were so interesting and informative, and were so much appreciated by our members.
Now the reason for my writing to you -- I have been the family genealogist for many years. Our son, not wanting to see it get lost or disposed of, is taking responsibility for it (and doing a great job). So, as I was going through old file folders to see if there was any thing more I should pass on to him, etc. I re-discovered some information the other day of which I question its disposition. I will quote part of the information:
* Anton B. SanderThen another quotation:
Birthplace - Brandvold, Solør, Norway
Oct. 4, 1851 - Jan. 23, 1881
Student at Luther College 1868-1874
Father - Brede B. Sander
Mother - Karen Huseby
1874 - A.B. from Luther College
1877 - Ph.D. Doctor of Philosophy (In Cursu) Yale University
First graduate from Luther College to obtain a PhD degree
Teacher of Latin, Greek, Hebrew and German
Luther College - 1878-1879
Flushing, N.Y. 1879-1881
* Information from book "Luther College Through Sixty Years 1861-1921" by Luther College Faculty Editorial Committee -- O. M. Norlie, O. A. Tinglestad and Karl T. Jacobsen. Augsburg Publishing House, Minneapolis, Minn. 1922."
Book - Luther College 1861-1961 by David T. Nelson, Luther College Press 1961, p. 109.The above information was attached to the folder which inside had a group of poems that were composed by him. They are handwritten in Norwegian on what appears to be plain tablet paper. I'm not that sure he has signed any of it, so the authorship perhaps couldn't be proven. This was given to me some years ago by a descendant in the family of Dr. Anton Sander so it was assumed by the family that the authorship was his. Anton Sander is a brother of my husband's grandmother. We thought it was of interest that this former Luther faculty member was a bit avant-garde for his time and had written some poems that have survived for over 100 years. They are written in Norwegian cursive for the most part. It would be interesting to know if in his writings one could see any tendencies that would have led to his dismissal from the faculty. I'm not sure what academic freedom was given to faculty at church colleges in the 1870's, but it must have been nearly non-existent to fire a PhD graduate of Yale University after only a year of teaching. It would be fun to know what they say in English. Our Norwegian is not all that good to get a real gist of the meaning.
Anton Sander was very popular with students. He had temerity in a meeting of the Decorah Congregation to challenge certain views of the church leadership. Moreover he was regarded by some of the faculty as "too American" accordingly, as not "firmly orthodox," he was dropped from the faculty after one year, 1878-1879. His promising career was cut short two years later by illness.
In Manuscript file at Luther College 1877-1881 by A. A. Veblen.
So my question is what should we do with it? I don't think it would be of interest to this generation unless it was translated, and yet it may have some historical value. Perhaps the Luther College Archives or the Norwegian American Historical Association would be interested in it.
I would appreciate your opinion as to what my course of action should be. If you are at all interested in it, I could bring it along with me one of the next times we come to Decorah, to stay at our apartment and partake of some trout fishing, and show it to you. I await your reply.
Sincerely,
Verla Williams
4333 Pine Ridge Trail NE
Iowa City, IA 52240
verla.vince@mchsi.com